In understanding the difference between domestic and offshore mutual funds, it is important to know what these funds are. It is true that there are a number of different mutual funds that are available to investors, but the basic construction of a mutual fund is that it is created by a firm that takes the money of many investors and invests that money into stocks, short-term money markets, bonds, and other types of securities. It is then that the manager of the portfolio manages that money by investing and trading the underlying securities of that fund. What happens is that capital gains or losses are realized and those gains and losses are then passed to each individual investor.
The United States and Canada have mutual funds that operate in a similar manner. These funds are open-end funds, closed-end funds, and unit investment trusts. Those investing in offshore mutual funds may find that the term is used more broadly. It is used to refer to any type of collective investment. The names that the investor may see these referred by include open-ended investment companies, unit trusts, undertakings for collective investments in transferable securities, and unitized insurance funds. That may seem like a lot to swallow, but many investors find that their offshore mutual fund investment opportunities are not as restricted because there are more types of mutual funds to invest in.
The offshore mutual fund
There are tax advantages to the offshore mutual fund that individuals will not find with their domestic mutual funds. Unless one of the rare loopholes is found, United States residents will still be fully taxed on their offshore mutual fund. This is usually referred to as “foreign arising income” on IRS tax forms. Nevertheless, individuals have found that investor-friendly countries allow savings on investments through tax incentives. Some offshore locations, such as the Virgin Islands, do not require tax to be paid. This allows the portion of the gain that would normally go to tax to be reinvested.
There are certain organizations that argue that allowing no tax to be paid or reducing the amount of tax is a form of legalized tax evasion. However, tax incentives are a way for individuals to invest into that economy, making that economy even stronger.
But what one will find is that there is a high degree of regulation when it comes to offshore mutual funds. One may find that there may be a minimum investment of $100,000 and that an individual is required to identify him or herself as a “professional investor.” In the U.S., Canada, and various other countries around the world, a person does not have to be a professional investor to invest in mutual funds. They have brokers who can take care of that for them and guide them through the process or simply take care of 100% of the account transactions.
There may also be instances in which the number of investors is limited because of stipulations set forth in constitutional documents. It is these types of regulations that can limit the number of foreign investors in mutual funds, but they can prove to be quite profitable.
The differences
So as you can see, there are differences between domestic mutual funds and offshore mutual funds. Offshore mutual funds can be a fantastic investment for the investor once the hurdles are cleared. Domestic mutual funds may be easier to invest in, but an individual may find that the return on their investment is not as high. However, many prefer their domestic mutual funds over the confusion that surrounds offshore mutual funds. Nevertheless, many find that the confusion is worth it and that the process becomes easier for them over time.

Calkain Companies Brokers Liberty Station In Bealeton, VATransaction sets pace for ?Fringe? Metro DC markets

Reston, VA – Calkain Companies, a national real estate investment brokerage firm, has procured the sale of a mixed use development that includes two retail centers with over 21,000 square feet of leased space, three undeveloped out-parcels and a child care facility in Bealeton, VA.

Load is defined as the fee or the commission that an investor pays to a mutual fund at the time of purchasing or redeeming the shares of the mutual fund.

If the commission is charged when the investor buys the shares, it is known as a front-end load. On the other hand if the commission is charged when the investors redeems his shares, it is known as a back-end load.

Certain funds apply back-end loads only if the shares are redeemed within a specific time period after being bought.

The argument for applying loads on mutual fund transactions is that these loads will discourage investors from trading frequently in mutual funds. If the investors quickly move in and out of mutual funds, the funds have to maintain a high cash position to meet these redemptions, which in turn decreases the returns of the funds.
Also frequent trading means the expenses of the mutual funds go up.

There are various arguments against load funds:

-The fees that the mutual funds collect as loads are passed on to the fund brokers. The loads do not provide any incentive for the fund manager for better performance of the funds. In other words, a load fund has no reason why its managers should perform better than those of no-load funds.

-In the last few decades, no difference has been seen in the returns of load and no-load funds (if the loads are not considered.) When the loads are considered, the investors of load funds have actually gained less than the investors of no-load funds.

-When a sales person knows that he is going to get a commission from a load fund, he tends to push the load fund more – even when the load funds are performing poorly as compared to no-load funds.

-Loads are understated by mutual funds. If an investor invests $1000 in a fund with 5% front-end load, the actual investment is only $950. Thus his actual load is $50 in $950 investment – a 5.26% load.

If an investor is already invested in a load fund, it doesn’t make sense to exit now. The load has already been paid for. The hold or sell decision should now only be based on what the investor thinks about the future performance of the fund. In a few funds, the exit load depends on the period for which the fund was held.Check the details of the fund prospectus for more information.

In most cases it is better to avoid load funds; however, investors should keep one thing in mind. Sometimes load funds can be a better choice than no-load funds. For example, an investor has a choice of two classes in a fund – class A and class B. Class A has 3% front-end load and Class B has no load. The investor however misses the fine print, which states that Class B has 1% 12b-1 annual fees.

If the fund will make 10% gains each year, its return in Class A (starting with actual amount invested $970) will be

($970) X (1.10) X (1.10) X (1.10) X (1.10) X (1.10) = $1562

For Class B, the returns will be

($1000) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) = $1532.

Thus the above example is an exception, where in the long run, the load fund will perform better than the no-load fund (with 12b-1 fees).

The fact is that a no-load fund cannot be considered a true no-load fund, if it charges fees from it’s investors in the form of 12b-1 and other fees.

Load is defined as the fee or the commission that an investor pays to a mutual fund at the time of purchasing or redeeming the shares of the mutual fund.

If the commission is charged when the investor buys the shares, it is known as a front-end load. On the other hand if the commission is charged when the investors redeems his shares, it is known as a back-end load.

Certain funds apply back-end loads only if the shares are redeemed within a specific time period after being bought.

The argument for applying loads on mutual fund transactions is that these loads will discourage investors from trading frequently in mutual funds. If the investors quickly move in and out of mutual funds, the funds have to maintain a high cash position to meet these redemptions, which in turn decreases the returns of the funds.
Also frequent trading means the expenses of the mutual funds go up.

There are various arguments against load funds:

-The fees that the mutual funds collect as loads are passed on to the fund brokers. The loads do not provide any incentive for the fund manager for better performance of the funds. In other words, a load fund has no reason why its managers should perform better than those of no-load funds.

-In the last few decades, no difference has been seen in the returns of load and no-load funds (if the loads are not considered.) When the loads are considered, the investors of load funds have actually gained less than the investors of no-load funds.

-When a sales person knows that he is going to get a commission from a load fund, he tends to push the load fund more – even when the load funds are performing poorly as compared to no-load funds.

-Loads are understated by mutual funds. If an investor invests $1000 in a fund with 5% front-end load, the actual investment is only $950. Thus his actual load is $50 in $950 investment – a 5.26% load.

If an investor is already invested in a load fund, it doesn’t make sense to exit now. The load has already been paid for. The hold or sell decision should now only be based on what the investor thinks about the future performance of the fund. In a few funds, the exit load depends on the period for which the fund was held.Check the details of the fund prospectus for more information.

In most cases it is better to avoid load funds; however, investors should keep one thing in mind. Sometimes load funds can be a better choice than no-load funds. For example, an investor has a choice of two classes in a fund – class A and class B. Class A has 3% front-end load and Class B has no load. The investor however misses the fine print, which states that Class B has 1% 12b-1 annual fees.

If the fund will make 10% gains each year, its return in Class A (starting with actual amount invested $970) will be

($970) X (1.10) X (1.10) X (1.10) X (1.10) X (1.10) = $1562

For Class B, the returns will be

($1000) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) X (1.10) X (0.99) = $1532.

Thus the above example is an exception, where in the long run, the load fund will perform better than the no-load fund (with 12b-1 fees).

The fact is that a no-load fund cannot be considered a true no-load fund, if it charges fees from it’s investors in the form of 12b-1 and other fees.

Mutual funds are a collection of stocks and/or bonds invested in different securities, which include fixed market securities and money market instrumentals. It facilitates investors to put their money under an efficient investment management. There are three types of mutual funds namely, income funds, growth funds, and balanced funds.
The basic principle underlying mutual funds is to pool in money with other people to convert it into funds. Mutual funds generally buy shares in stocks wherein an experienced fund manager performs the task of selecting, purchasing and selling off the stocks himself. Certificates are then issued to the shareholders as a testimony of proof of their partnership and participation in the emoluments of funds.
There are particularly three ways in which you can make money from a mutual fund. They are:
1. Benefits can be earned from the commission on stocks, and interests on bonds. All the income received all round the year is paid by the funds in the form of a distribution.
2. The fund will have an outstanding benefit provided the funds sell high priced securities. Most of the profits are given back to the investors in a distribution.
3. The value of the fund’s share automatically increases with an increase in the value of unsold high priced fund holdings. Accordingly, you can always sell shares of your mutual fund for profits.
Many people find investing in mutual funds an attractive option to that of dealing directly with the stock market because it is comparatively safe. In fact, these days, mutual funds have become the first preference of many investors. Mutual funds provide a balanced and better approach compared to conventional stock market alternatives. It has an added advantage of investing in several distinct sectors and firms, so, if one company suffers losses, the others may be rising. Investing in mutual funds, therefore, minimizes the loss-bearing risk of monetary assets.
In a nutshell, here are the salient points of the advantages of mutual funds:
1. Cost-effectiveness of investing in mutual funds: The main advantage of investing in mutual funds is the efficient management of your finances. Investors buy funds because they lack the competence and time to manage their own portfolio. It is a cost effective method, especially for a small investor because it is expensive to get a manager to manage individual investments.
2. Diversification: Compared to individual stocks or bonds, mutual funds diversify the risk of bearing loss. The basic intention being to invest in a diverse number of assets in order to overcome the negatives of loss making stocks or bonds by the profits reaped by others.
3. Economy of Scale: The transaction expenses are relatively low as a mutual fund is bought and sold in large amounts of credits.
4. Liquidity: Mutual funds provide the opportunity of converting shares into cash at any point of time.
5. Simplicity: It is easy to buy a mutual fund. Most companies have their own automatic purchase plans, and the minimum investment rates are very small.
Therefore, investing in mutual funds is certainly a secure investment as the chance of loss is spread out, and the opportunity for gains are numerous. At the same time, it is both cost-effective and an investment that gives great future returns.
The days of depending on government largesse in meeting old age financial requirements are growing dimmer by the day. Hence, investing in mutual funds can be a wise choice, especially for those who plan for an early retirement and hope to enjoy a secure senior citizenship.

A mutual fund is also known as an open-end fund and is an investment company that spreads its money across a diversified portfolio of securities- including stocks, bonds or money market instruments.

Shareholders who invest in a fund each own a representative portion of those investments, less any expenses charged by the fund.

Advantages of Investing in Mutual Funds

1. Professional Management

2. Liquidity

3. Explicit investment goals

4. Simple reinvestment programs

5. Investment diversification.

Disadvantages of Investing in Mutual Funds

1. Mutual funds cannot be bought or sold during regular trading hours, but instead are priced just once per day.

2. Many funds charge hefty fees, leading to lower overall returns.

3. Overtime, statistics reveal that most actively managed funds tend to under perform their benchmark averages.

Mutual fund investors make money either by receiving dividends and interest from their investment, or by the rise n value of the securities. Dividends interest and profits from the sale of any securities (capital gains) are passed on to the shareholders in the form of distributions. And shareholders generally are allowed to sell (redeem) their shares at any time for the closing market price of the fund on that day.

Reasons to Invest in Mutual Funds:

There are various reasons for the investors to choose mutual funds over other investments such as bonds and stocks.

Diversity can both increase and decrease your potential returns and decrease your overall risk. Mutual funds allow an investor to spread out his or her money across a few as a handful to as many as several thousand companies at one time.

Funds can be beneficial for small investors who would be forced to pay enormous transaction fees if they bought the securities individually and for people who don’t have time to research their own investments or who don’t trust their own investment expertise.

Mutual funds are not necessarily low cost investments. Many of them charge one time “load fees” to new purchasers.

Types of Mutual Funds:

1. Closed End Mutual Funds:

These funds issue a fixed number of shares to the investing public and usually trade on the major exchanges just like corporate stocks.

2. Open End Mutual Funds:

These funds stand ready to issue and redeem shares on a continuous basis. Shareholders buy the shares at the net asset value and can redeem them at the current market price.

3. Load Funds:

Load funds refer to sales charge paid by an investor who purchases shares in a mutual fund. When sales charge is imposed at the time of purchase, it is known as a front-end load. Back end loads represent charges that are assessed when the investor sells the fund.

4. No Load Funds:

A No Load Fund is sold without a sales charge.

For more investment opportunities please visit www.wealthcapfund.com

Every investor should consider Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). The younger brother of open-end index mutual funds is growing up fast and showing greater versatility. ETFs are open-end index mutual funds that trade like stocks (and closed-end mutual funds).
There are three legal structures of ETFs: Open-end mutual fund (the difference between the ETF structure and an open-end mutual fund is the ETF is exchange traded, whereas the traditional mutual fund is purchased and redeemed by the fund itself), Unit investment trust and Grantor trust.
The open-end mutual fund structure has a diversification requirement, mandated by the Investment Company Act of 1940, which limit how it mimics some smaller or specialized indices and could result in a tracking error. The other principal difference for the investor is that other than the open-end mutual fund, dividends must be paid out in cash to investors. These structural differences aren’t significant for most investors. The more important question is whether it’s the right one for you in terms of what index it’s designed to follow.
The index and dividend payout requirements are disclosed in its prospectus and most Exchange Traded Funds also have websites where you can find this information. Tracking error is the difference between the return on the index the EFT is designed to follow and the actual return on the index.
An EFT which holds all 500 stocks in the S&P 500, in the same weighting as the S&P 500, should have exactly the same return as that index, less fund expenses. That’s an easy one. ETFs that are created to track, say, the biotech stock index will have different interpretations of that index.
A biotech could weight all stocks equally, weight by market cap, hold big cap or small cap bio stocks, and so on. As a result, performance will vary with the success of its strategy. A good illustration of this is in “Biotech ETFs: It Pays to Shop Around”, in the October 15th BusinessWeek. The five funds BusineesWeek highlights had year-to-date return ranging from -3.7% to 27.3%.
ETFs are required to disclose their holdings every day, unlike mutual funds which only have to disclose once a quarter. However, this should not be a big deal because we’re dealing with index funds and the components of indexes should not change very often.
There are two aspects of ETF liquidity for investors to consider: the ETF and its index’s securities. Since ETFs trade like stocks, they can be traded all day long. Open-end mutual funds can be purchased or redeemed only once daily, after the market closes. You have to put your order in prior to 4PM (while the stock market is still open) or wait until the next day. The liquidity of the EFT-the frequency with which it trades and the depth of the market-is similar to a stock and parallels the size of the EFT.
But ETFs also have a very unique feature, they can be expanded or contracted depending upon demand, see Share Creation/Redemption, which provides them with even greater liquidity. And, ETFs can be more liquid than the individual shares they hold, thus, providing investors with greater liquidity. This is especially true for an ETF that holds small cap stocks, which are thinly traded, or bonds other than US Treasuries, which trade infrequently.
Authorized Participants, think big banks who act as market makers or specialists on an exchange, trade market baskets of the underlying index’s securities to the EFT in exchange for new ETF shares, when the demand for ETF shares increases. The Authorized Participants then sell these newly created ETF shares on the open market. The process is reversed if there are more sellers than buyers of the ETF.
The purpose of this feature is to keep the ETF’s market price as close to its net asset value as possible. (The risk exists that the Authorized Participants would not, or would not be able to, perform this function during a market crisis. The result of this could be an ETF which trades away from its net asset value.)
The price at which the ETF trades is based upon supply and demand. Unlike the share of an open-end mutual fund which is purchased or redeemed at its net asset value (NAV), the price of an ETF share may trade above or below its NAV. By way of comparison, closed-end mutual funds often trade away from their NAV for extended periods of time.
Unfortunately, many closed-end mutual funds trade significantly below their NAVs. The Authorized Participants provide vital role, through share creation and redemption, in keeping the price of the ETF close to its NAV.
The structure of Exchange Traded Funds give the investor a tax advantage over mutual funds. Open-end mutual funds, even index funds, must sell shares of the stock they own to raise cash when redemptions exceed purchases. These sales can result in taxable gains and losses which are passed along to the investor. Thus, you could have a taxable gain on the fund you own, even though you didn’t sell it. The share creation and redemption process shifts this liability to the Authorized Participant.
If the Authorized Participant trades shares to the EFT, it is responsible for the taxes on any gains if it sells the securities it received from the ETF. Of course, the investor is liable for any taxes upon selling an ETF or mutual fund.
ETFs have lower fund expenses than index mutual funds, although the difference is usually only a few basis points. (Don’t be misled by advertisements which compare their expenses to actively managed open-end mutual funds.) Theoretically, the expenses for an ETF or mutual fund structured to track the same index, assuming they’re roughly the same size fund, should be the same.
Since ETFs are traded like stocks, the commission charged to buy or sell is similar to the commission on a stock trade. Index funds are no-load, and are commission free, although some charge a back-end fee if you don’t hold it for a certain period of time. The second cost to consider is the bid/ask spread. Even stock and ETF has one, although in most cases they’re very small, i.e., a few cents, unless the ETF is very illiquid. Transaction costs-none vs. some-favor no-load mutual funds over ETFs but the cost differential is slight
What are the uses and advantages of ETFs? Come back next week and I’ll tell you.

No- Risk Lawsuit Funding – Legal Funding For Your Pending Lawsuits

Legal funding is cash funding made directly available to the plaintiff before his/her lawsuit comes to its final settlement. It could be advance funding made available before arbitration, a trial or hearing, or it could be funding made available during the appeals process.

It is also called as Lawsuit funding, Law funding, Lawsuit cash funding, Lawsuit pre-settlement funding and Lawsuit loan.

If you are a plaintiff involved in a lawsuit, and are represented by an attorney, you may be eligible for Legal funding or Lawsuit funding on your pending lawsuit settlement.

Usually, financial hardship of plaintiffs is the result of being injured and not being able to work. As you can understand, if they are not working, it may lead to drastic sudden reduction in income. This situation can cause a serious blow to individuals and their families struggling to survive economically. If they are not getting any salary they cannot pay their monthly bills. These bills may be the direct result of the injury such as medical and rehabilitation costs.

David vs. Goliath: Most of the times legal battle between plaintiffs and defendants is like a clash between David vs. Goliath. Because very often defendants, are represented by attorneys hired by big insurance companies. Even if, law is on your side, deep-pocket defendants can buy time with legal ploys and delays, and manoeuver to frustrate the plaintiffs. They exploit the cumbersome process of law.

For example, even if a defendant has no legal grounds for an appeal, well-financed defendants can delay settlement of a lawsuit for months or even years or by filing appeal after appeal. Plaintiffs are very often pressured financially, because medical bills and other expenses – not to mention lost wages – add up to a budget stretched beyond its limits.

There is a famous saying – If the misery of the poor be caused not by the laws of nature, but by our institutions, great is our sin.

But here legal funding or lawsuit funding can be a great help. Plaintiff and his attorneys get a timely financial help in form of legal funding at a critical time and now they are ready to negotiate from a position of strength.

You can get your Legal funding – Lawsuit funding in 3 Easy and Simple Steps:

1st. Step – Submit the easy and simple application for Legal funding. Application and approval process is free and a good legal funding company will not charge any kind of upfront fees

2nd. Step – Your attorney faxes the required documents to lawsuit funding company. Approval for legal funding is always fast. Mostly in 24 to 48 hours (some times in 4-6 hours).

3rd Step – If approved for Legal funding, funds are wired into your bank account, the same day. Of course, you can take a bank check also.

Legal Funding or Lawsuit funding are non-recourse transactions. Plaintiff pays back only if he/she wins or settles the lawsuit. If the plaintiff does not win their case, they do not owe any money to legal funding company. The money that was advanced by lawsuit funding is not owed. Any fees that may have accrued are not owed. You pay back legal funding only if you win or settle the case. No Win- No Pay Back, Period.

Legal Funding levels the playing field. There is no reason for you to settle for less than their case is worth. Legal funding or Lawsuit funding is no-risk and a win-win help for plaintiffs involved in lawsuits.

Opalesque, the world’s largest subscription-based publisher on alternative investments, hosts a Webinar: The Monetization of Hedge Fund Management Firms on July 10th 2008 10 am New York time. Registration is now open and qualified participants (see below) can register here: www.opalesque.com/index.php?act=static?=webinarTraditional Ways to Partially Monetize A Hedge Fund Management CompanyThere are five methods to partially monetize interests in a hedge fund management company: (1) a traditional IPO(2) a reverse merger into a public shell (or SPAC)(3) a listing on AIM, without any capital being raised(4) selling less than 100% of the equity or (5) selling a revenue interest. Examples of traditional IPOs would include Man, Och-Ziff, Gottex, RAB Capital; BlueBay, Polar, and Ashmore (plus Fortress, Blackstone, and Partners Group, if extended to alternative asset managers). These should not be confused with the IPOs of publicly traded closed ended funds.Examples of reverse mergers would include GLG and Asset Alliance. Examples of an AIM listing without raising capital would include Absolute and Charlemagne. An example of a partial sale would include Highbridge and examples of revenue interests would include AQR, First Quadrant, Avenue, Lansdowne, Winton, and most firms backed by seeding platforms. With the exception of Man and the Partners Group in Switzerland, each of the IPOs has been a disappointment relative to their initial public offering price. As for Reverse mergers, GLG has not been a success thus far, even after GLG coughed up nearly $500 million in slippage to get the deal done. The Asset Alliance ? Tailwind reverse merger which was announced nearly 5 months ago has gone radio silent, which is not a positive sign. AIM listings without raising capital lack a third party value validation when offered to the public and Absolute has been nothing short of a disaster, while Charlemagne is off more than 50%. Selling less than 100% of the equity or a revenue interest seems to work best, but a minority equity stake often imposes restrictions under which hedge fund managers chafe, while revenue interests do not. Whether a less than 100% equity stake or a revenue interest, each method still begs the question of how to monetize the rest of the ownership.Selling OutThe only way to fully monetize a hedge fund management business is to sell out. Unfortunately, a total sale usually ends up with the sellers leaving at the first opportunity and the buyer usually has great difficulty in maintaining the value that it purchased. Examples of this include Glenwood, RMF, HBV, and Old Lane. As such, buyers will naturally be(a)ware and pricing will usually be lower than in other industries as a result.Creating a Reinsurer or Bank and Merging Some or All of the Hedge Fund Manager into itA new alternative is for the hedge fund manager to sponsor the creation of a reinsurer or bank that allocates all of its investable assets to the sponsoring manager, providing a significant amount of permanent capital for the manager (making the management firm more valuable) and producing significantly higher returns for investors than the manager’s funds without a proportionate increase in risk. Once the reinsurer or bank is fully developed, it can acquire some or all of the hedge fund management firm. In this manner, the monetization process is able to benefit from many of the better points of other monetization alternatives. For example, it permits a total sale (without the normal problem of loss of control) and creates a public market for the interests of the hedge fund manager, but as a reinsurer or bank, rather than as an asset manager (which probably means higher market multiples). Carefully crafted, the transaction can be structured on a very tax efficient basis, particularly if partnership taxation for publicly traded managers or deferred compensation for offshore funds is lost.While this alternative is yet unproven, it is more or less how Warren Buffett transitioned from being a hedge fund manager and monetized his asset management business. This summer a $15 billion hedge fund manager is likely to announce a merger with a Swiss private bank as the first step in a similar process. Our Panel:Joseph K. Taussig is the Founder of Taussig Capital and has acted as a merchant banker for numerous financial services startups since 1990. Most of the capital for these companies has been provided by the hedge fund industry or hedge fund investors and most of the startups invest their assets in hedge fund strategies.Matthias Knab, Director of Opalesque Ltd, will moderate this webinar. Matthias Knab is an internationally recognized expert on hedge funds and alternatives and has frequently served as chairman of hedge fund conferences in New York, Tokyo, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Miami, Bahamas, Stockholm, Dubai etc. In addition, he has presented or moderated at hedge fund events in Sydney, Cape Town, Madrid, and Bombay, and lectured at numerous universities on the subjects of hedge funds and the state of the global alternative asset management industry. Limited to founders (or partners owning more than 15%) of hedge fund or FoHF management companiesParticipation in the Webinar on July 10th at 10 am New York time is limited to founders (or partners owning more than 15%) of hedge fund or FoHF management companies who would like to learn more about creating a reinsurer or bank in order to generate significant amounts of permanent capital and provide superior returns (without a proportionate increase in risk) for their investors. Provided that a founder or 15% partner is present, additional colleagues from the hedge fund or FoHF management company may also participate. Registration is now open and qualified participants can register here: www.opalesque.com/index.php?act=static?=webinarAbout Opalesque:Since February 2003, Opalesque is publishing Alternative Market Briefing, the premium news service on hedge funds and alternatives. The launch of these Briefing was a revolution in the hedge fund media space (“Opalesque changed the world by bringing transparency where there was opacity and by delivering an accurate professional reporting service.” – Nigel Blanchard, Culross) combining proprietary news with the ?clipping service? approach of integrating third party news. Each week, Opalesque publications are read by more than 400,000 industry professionals from all over the globe. Opalesque is the only daily hedge fund publisher which is actually read by the elite managers themselves (www.opalesque.com/op_testimonials.html). For more information,please go to >> Hedge funds news

Ever wondered what money market funds are and how they can help you make the most out of your money? Well, money market funds are fixed, short term investments in low risk holdings or securities. By law money market funds must invest in low risk mutual funds making them a good way for existing investors to diversify their interests or for newcomers to launch themselves into the marketplace. Choosing a Money Market FundMoney market funds can generate returns in a relatively short time span in accordance with interest rates, and can be redeemed at any time, which is why they are an ideal low risk option for people wanting to preserve their money in a volatile market.These money market funds are essentially part of a mutual fund which invests in such things as government securities and low risk stocks and bonds. However, because money market funds are part of mutual funds they are not secured investments and are therefore not insured to cover losses. Losses in the money market are rare as money market shares are able to consistently maintain a net asset value of $1.00 per share. The net asset value of a share is usually determined at the end of a trading day and it is only when investments perform very poorly that the value will drop below $1.00. Investing In Money Market FundsSome money market mutual funds can offer tax exemptions by investing in short term debts. However, before investing make sure you work out your final tax obligations. In order to find the best mutual funds you need to consider how the investment can work for you. For example, money market funds all have a ranking in the marketplace so be sure to do your research and find out where they sit. The next step is to work out how much money you have to invest as this will determine the best mutual funds to help you establish the portfolio you are after. There are money market directories that can be used to compare different funds and calculate expected risks. You also need to be aware of the rates and charges that come with money market funds. Although these will differ between funds, most incur an initial sales fee, ongoing management fees and transaction fees. To be competitive money market funds will offer different packages for different classes of investors. Some packages may include a flat rate advisory fee while others will incur a fee that decreases as your portfolio value increases. Fees can also be allocated according to the value of a group of funds instead of a single fund. Finding the Best Mutual FundMoney market funds require compulsory professional management, undertaken by third party mutual fund managers. This means control of your fund is put into the hands of your fund manager, another reason to ensure you are choosing the right money market fund. Mutual fund managers research different investment options and have the power to buy, sell and trade your funds on the market. A skilled fund manager will have the ability to forecast the financial viability of a certain asset or investment and make adjustments in accordance with the fund?s set financial principals. Another major role of mutual fund managers is to predict the financial situation of the fund itself. This means managers need to calculate how much money will be entering and exiting the fund through investors in order to plan for future investments. Like any investments, money market funds can have both positive and negative returns, but at all costs are the most low risk way of investing your money into the marketplace.